Communication

Blog member Amber mentioned a link to a BBC radio show a coming drama about babies refusing to be born in such a cruel world; she found it very poignant. Here’s the link:

www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01kt43s

I’d like to think the substitute teacher chose this series of topics independently, however now realize they’ve been “supplied”; the content given by The Committee seems to flow from one subject to the other, and the information from one question often leads additional questions from all of you. Pretty smart this Committee, even if we don’t know the difference between Lennon & McCartney!

Today, communication.

ST = substitute teacher    Erik = Erik      C = The Committee

ST:     Can you give us a look forward into human communications?
C:       You would all do well to examine animals and in them can be seen a preview of what human communications will come to resemble.
ST:    Animals don’t have conversations like humans, so…..humans stop speaking? (The substitute teacher stops for a moment to ponder the many advantages this presents.)
C:       Your speaking will continue, certainly, and it will improve.
ST:    How?
C:       Look at sign language; hand signals used where words are not heard. The receiver of the information observes both hands and lips, the combinations are used, yet either one can be used for effective communication, independent of the other.
ST:     That’s right, isn’t it? Some people on television cover their mouths when speaking, don’t they?
C:        Yes. In this we see a way communications will improve, be more efficient.
ST:     OK, let’s get back to the cats and dogs.
Erik:   Woof woof.
ST:     Do you like cats or dogs better, Erik?
Erik:   Both; depends on the personality, mostly.
ST:     Are there pets in Heaven?
Erik:  Yup, all the animals on Earth can be seen in Heaven. It’s just like with humans; we don’t have the same physical body or functions, and we present ourselves as we were on Earth, but don’t have to. Multi-layer personalities and consciousness, remember? Same with the animals, and part of many people’s souls go to be with an animal body rather than human one.
ST:     So when somebody says, “he’s a beast” it might have been true?
C:       Yes, quite true.
ST:    Does every type of animal have this, a mind and consciousness and a soul part of a being in Heaven, the afterlife?
Erik:  Nope, just the thinking animals, the intelligent ones. Mostly the ones that sleep.
ST:    What about sea life?
Erik:  Same deal; intelligent sea life has this, too, like whales and stuff.
ST:    What animals do not?
C:       The list is extensive and excessive for this space, as you can understand, yet the animals on Earth without a memory that influences behavior – you would call these insects, as one example – are not this way. All of the animals that are kept as pets or livestock, all of these do have this aspect of a soul that resides, in partial “time” with the physical presence.
ST:    Where does the soul step into a physical existence completely?
Erik:  Never; there’s always some back at the home office.
C:       The awake and sleep cycle maintains the connections and provides for adjustments, as is this process with you all.
ST:    OK, what about the communications?
C:       Animals that flee inland before arrival of tsunamis are a good example of this improvement. It could be said there is a trade-off between cognitive and instinctual thought. This is true to a degree.
ST:   What will humans trade away and what will we get?
C:      There will not be a trade off of these abilities; both types of this thinking will improve. Observe dogs kept as pets; when the animal’s group is threatened, the dog will defend to its death, if necessary. There is no training or socialization of this behavior; the dog will act swiftly, with behavior and force that correspond to the attack. The dog might growl, show teeth, bark or bite without contact before a counter-attack.
ST:     Sometimes dogs attack when they should not.
C:       By human standards, yes. The dog does this when it perceives a threat.
ST:    Will humans do this with improved communications? Attack where seemingly unprovoked?
Erik:  No way, humans aren’t programmed like that, plus humans do that shit now.
ST:    There was a terrible tragedy in the USA very recently, Aurora, Colorado. Was that what you might mean, Erik?
Erik:   Nah, that dude planned the whole thing, it wasn’t like an unprovoked attack.
ST:     From what’s been reported, there was no provocation. It appears the shooter knew nobody, and nothing happened previously that might be a provocation or cause, that we know of.
Erik:   That dude wanted attention. There was other stuff goin’on, too.
ST:     Like?
Erik:  Shift energy; it got to him, but there was a programmed factor to it, which nobody wants to hear about. There’ll be more incidents like this, I’m sorry to say.
C:       Improved communication abilities will make more people aware of bad intentions close by; incidents as this will be less; partially because intent will be detected and understood, just as animals understand these.
ST:    So what’s going to happen with our communications?
Erik:  Y’all will still read and write and speak like now, but this is only on Earth. Communication will begin to have thoughts sent and received as a part of it. This seems kooky now, ‘cause some people think that’s their own imagination. They don’t think it’s possible another person’s thought could come into their head; nobody ever said it to ‘em. So when it happens, they think “what a strange thought I had” but it wasn’t a thought, it was a message.
C:       Indeed, true this is. Soon the separation of thoughts will be more clear; we suggest words typed and then changed in color. The colored letters as recognized now will be as the arriving thoughts are recognized.
ST:    Uh oh…are we going to be able to read each others’ minds?
Erik:  Nah….you’ll only get thought intended to be sent out and only the ones intended for you. The thoughts and the speech; those won’t be able to be separated.
ST:    So if a politician gives a speech…
Erik:  …..he’s gonna get caught with his skirt around his ankles!
ST:    Politicians don’t always lie.
Erik:  Soon they won’t ever be able to.
ST:    So, Erik, we’ll be able to look at a person who is speaking to us; one-on-one or a group listening to a speech, or a panel of speakers to an audience, whatever, and we the listeners will know what the thoughts are mixed in with the speaker’s words?
Erik: You got it, and if s/he’s planning –I used that he & she word you like, and I slipped that into your keyboard with the thought, just like we’re talkin’ about, like that? – and if s/he’s planning to say one thing but thinks another, FAIL! They better just shut the truck up and stop before they start.
C:       What thoughts you prefer to keep can be contained by avoiding interactions. This will work in all ways, the positive thoughts, admiration, love, lust, admiration, concern, pity and danger will be projected just as might be sent the less positive thoughts.
ST:    So a customer that admires the cashier in the store?
C:      The cashier will understand this.
ST:   Some people will be embarrassed.
C:      No, this will not happen, as the thoughts sent are not read by others not intended to be part of the communication. Your speech with disturbance of air is uncontrolled in this way and we see it as reckless in some cases, however it is an aspect of Earth that great learning this uncontrolled ability to listen provides. In your thought communications, the wires do not cross. The good intent of the thought will be felt by the receiver of the message, knowing that others will not know the thought or have the opportunity to interject.
Erik: Even if a nice girl thinks the cashier is a hunk, and he might not like it to be heard, but he still likes to know somebody thinks that of him, right?
C:      Yes, the embarrassment is caused often by observer reaction. This part will not be; sometimes the embarrassment is the idea one was found out, yet the ability of thoughts will be understood quickly by all, and so you will grow used sending and receiving them as part of communications.
ST:   So will our thoughts change?
C:     With certainty, and all humanity will soon think through a thought before interacting and will become accustomed to thinking a sentence as it might be spoken before speaking it; as the sentence soon is spoken with words, the listener, the object of the message will quickly and efficiently pick up the thought and then the words. Consider a black & white photocopy quickly read before a full color version is presented with detail and images to accompany the same message. The pre-thought will be understood just before the real thought is delivered.
ST:    Will this work for all communications, speech and written?
C:       Yes.
ST:    Why do we not have this now?
Erik:  Mostly ‘cause humanity doesn’t want it. It’s been de-emphasized.
C:       We see technical development as the cause for many things deemed spiritual as being de-emphasized. As humanity began to re-discover physical properties of Earth and develop mechanical abilities, which lead to measurement of what is called physics, it was assumed that what could not be detected and measured was not relevant. This lead to much advance based upon effects and symptoms. An effect could be seen but not its cause; the effect was observed and measured until the cause identified and measured. In many cases the effect’s study cannot determine cause. Humans know the physical properties of a brain but yet do not know how the brain functions, how information is stored and retrieved. The information is not in the brain, it is delivered through the brain, in both directions. There is no such thing as loss of memory; it is memory temporarily unable to be retrieved.
ST:    So communication with thought bypasses the brain maybe?
C:       Yes.
ST:    Whoa!!! How??
C:       The brain uses physical senses to receive information; computers will call this a compiler. The brain will compile the sounds an ear detects, receives and sends along, assembling these bits of information and comparing them to a file. Where there is a match, there is understanding. The eyes do the same. Thoughts do not have effect on ears, eyes or any other sense.
Your soul, the true energetic essence of your being, surrounds and permeates your body and this energy being sends and receives the thought energy. As you sleep, your soul steps away. As sounds and information are given, your soul returns to be able to respond. You wake up. This is only your physical body becoming active; your true energetic being is never asleep this way.
ST:     So we will know when a seaquake has caused a tsunami to approach?
C:        Yes.
ST:     How will we know there’s a tsunami approaching?
C:       You will not know of the tsunami, you will know to move. The message will be unmistakable; go that way, now and as quickly as you can. You will know this as you know water will make you wet.
ST:     What about reading and writing?
C:        It will not change however thought energy which accompanies the words will be felt as the words are read. We note a comment to this weblog about emotional connection being different and less liked; this description of emotion is the detection of thought energy.
ST:      You mean a reader that said there was a difference between some messages and others, some easier to understand?
C:        This is detection of the new energy we have projected; we are not human and accustomed to human energies, the reason you are on Earth, where you quickly make note of the feeling as different and less pleasurable. We do not detect this as you do, we are not advanced in this you on Earth are.
ST:     What might change about writing, then?
C:        In human terms it is going to become less wordy; more efficient. Thoughts will be detected. Humans will read more, we can say with certainty.
ST:     Why?
C:        Imagery changes the energetic interpretation of a message; crude human image facsimiles severely limit the true image and cut the thought down. These are apparently easier to digest and so, are popular. It is perceived to be easier to not exercise, so many avoid it; it is not easier to suffer symptoms of physical distress which results yet a habit, once established, often continues until an abrupt course correction is encountered, as with all things of life. So you will watch but less and read more.
ST:      So a book versus a movie, what about them?
C:        Many readers of a book will comment on the movie being less entertaining. Part of the reason is attributed to knowledge of the story however the thought energy that accompanies the words of the book is far more interesting; the movie limits this severely in many cases. The though energy contains the image file and it is through this file you feel the emotion.
ST:      So what about music that sounds so nice?
C:        Thought energy accompanies the sound waves. As there is confluence of sound, the effect multiplies geometrically. Where sound wave frequencies are in harmonic multiples – chords you have named them – the pleasant effects increase. The thought energy behind the sounds is felt.
ST:      Are there great images in Heaven we can see?
C:        Your vibration limits the ability to see, yet we can provide an example from where you can extrapolate. Imagine the improvement from a black & white plate image of the middle of your 19th century up to a beautiful, full color glossy photograph today; apply this same expansion of view, sharpness of image, vividness of detail spread across an area many times larger than the largest print you have now. This begins to give you an idea of what images you will see in Heaven. Look to the sky and nature and all things around you of beauty and imagine this beauty expanded in the same proportion of the black & white plate to today’s digital, then printed glossy image. Thought energy is what will convey this.
ST:    Why can’t I see this now?!??
Erik:  You can and do, every night. You just don’t remember.
ST:    Life sucks.
C:      Life teaches and you all such great students of it are. We look forward, we all do, to the moment of your return, each and all of you in your own interval, so that we may admire and love you and salute you and look up to you and present you all around the universe as graduates, our elders, our superiors, our betters, for the challenges and tribulations you have assumed to go where you are now. We will salute you to the others and show, with our own unlimited pride, what progress we achieved by helping you all on your beautiful Earth, this most beautiful of the planets of so many galaxies. Until once again, all be well.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

About Author

Substitute Teacher


« Previous Post
Next Post »
%d bloggers like this: