Quick announcement: We’re one month behind on the Ask Erik magazine column because Kim was so busy with traveling for the tour that she wasn’t able to channel the answers from Erik, but we’ll make the November 1st deadline and you’ll have the results shortly after. The next time I call out for questions will be around the third week of November. Sorry, guys, but life happens.
Enjoy the Australian version of Erik’s blog HERE. It’s really good, so I recommend you guys subscribe for updates!
Also, as most of you know, omorrow at 7 PM CT is Erik’s Hour of Enlightenment radio show. Call 619-639-4606 15 minutes prior to talk to Erik or click HERE.
So about today’s post. Please don’t shoot the messenger, and know that I’m not crazy about either candidate in this race, but many of you have asked me to pose certain questions about both candidate.
Me: Erik, a lot of people want to know about the presidential elections, but let’s do it really quickly because I don’t want this video to be too long. Could you describe what both Clinton and Trump would do for this country? What would the repercussions be? I’m not going to ask you to say which would make a better president. I just want to know what you see.
(Long pause)
Kim (laughing): He’s putting this very—god this puts me in a rough position. He’s putting this pretty black and white.
Me: Okay. I won’t put your address and telephone number on the video, so don’t worry.
Kim laughs.
Kim: I don’t care because they’re not my personal views!
Erik (Putting his right hand out): Over here is Clinton and (putting his left hand out) over here is Trump. Over here (He moves his “Clinton” hand,) I see a lot of financial debt occurring. Over here (He moves his “Trump” hand.) I see the opposite. I don’t know how and what avenues they’re going to take to do whatever with the money, but the end result, like what you’re going to see—and I can give you this information because it’s an alternate, like a parallel dimension—
Me: Who would create more jobs?
(Long pause)
Kim: Um, he’s actually pointing to Trump.
Me: Okay. Who would make our country safer? You know, Hillary has a lot of foreign policy experience—
Maybe not so stellar a record in it, but…
Kim: He’s showing them as pretty equal but for different reasons.
Erik: If I was to say one over the other, I’d pick Trump.
Me: Okay.
Erik: But it’s so close, it’s hard to say. They’re both going to be successful in that area.
Me: Okay. One last thing. I worry about Trump because he seems so reckless and puts his foot in his mouth. Will he surprise everyone and become more of a statesman [if he becomes president?] That sort of temperament is a little scary. Do I need to be scared?
Kim: I can relate, Elisa!
Erik: Trump has experience with experiencing his own consequences for his behavior. Sometimes it seems irrational or impulsive—
Sometimes?
Erik: –and reckless.
Me: Yeah!
Erik: He has had to live with the consequences of his behavior.
Kim: He interrupted himself and said—
Erik: The one thing Trump is able to do no matter what situation he’s in is that he can manifest shit like no other. He can manifest what he wants, and it’s not because of his financial standing. It’s because of his ability to see it and align with it.
Me: Like his thoughts create reality, really easily?
Erik: Very easily because he’s in alignment with the belief that it can happen.
Me: Well, will he be more of a statesman, though? Can we trust him with the nuclear codes and things like that if he becomes president?
Erik: Yeah, you can because he knows where he came from, and he’s very patriotic. He wants to protect [the country] for people, but his avenues to do so are exotic or almost foreign to what you’re used to. That’s why he’s ruffling a lot of feathers. I will say, though, that ego can get in the way. I feel like, at times, whether he’s elected or not, ego can get in his way. That’s when it becomes difficult because then he can’t see or even relate to the American citizen.
Great.
Erik: When you’re in ego, you’re blinded and can’t relate to others.
Me: Well, maybe he’ll surround himself with good advisers and a good team that will help rein him in.
Erik: It’s funny because the people he’s appointed to be a part of his team already are very much like him. So what happens is he sees himself in others, and it kind of keeps him saying, “Oh, wait.” It keeps him on his toes, but he does have good checks and balances. He has people who are going to be just as brutally honest with him as he is with the American people. They’re going to make him listen. They both [Clinton and Trump] have good teams. They both have good checks and balances.
Me: Good. All right. Really quickly, I have two more questions, and they only require a one word answer. Hillary—will she be indicted, yes or no? I know there’s free will, and things change but as of this timeline.
Kim: Just when you said her name, he said no. Before you even asked the question, I heard, “no.”
Me: All right. At this juncture, and I know it can change, who looks like they’re going to be the next president, Trump or Hillary?
Kim (smiling): I love how he answers your question before you ask it! He said, “Trump,” so when you said, “Who,” he said, “Trump.”
Since then, readings on the eBoard indicate Hillary, but I haven’t asked in a while. Free will makes the outcome bounce from one to the other depending what scandal or foot in mouth things happen.
Me: Okay, well thank you, Erik! Thank you, Kim!
Erik: Thank you, Mama.
Kim: It’s always my pleasure. I thank you so much.
Me: Well, you’re a sweetie. This is wonderful. Bye!
Kim: Bye!
