Y’all, I know I’m sounding like my daughter’s beauty blog, Pretty Shiny Sparkly, but I am so excited about my new Chaga mushroom extract. I’ve been putting it on my face twice a day followed by the Chaga Face and Body Cream and after a week, my skin is like a newborn’s butt, only not as smelly. My fine lines are even gone. The rest of my body looks like crap, but it’s a start, and at least I can cover that. 

Enjoy the third in our interview series!

Q:          What purpose do ETs have in meeting with world leaders?

AE:        Explain the sentiments and desires of humanity, and the portions of it with which the leaders are aligned.

Q:          The leaders don’t know this?

AE:        They do however their priorities often don’t place these atop their list. We have seen some ETs take the role of explaining humanity to leaders. We suggest an example; a very rich person not given to great philanthropy certainly knows it is possible and can easily pursue it. It would erode a good deal of the wealth the rich person possesses and for this reason and others, is often not followed. This is a choice of humanity, to transfer wealth and allow the accumulation of riches, to value these riches and to act upon receipt of them. Free will to act is the prime directive of humanity, and the ETs meeting with leaders often hope to show leadership where they can work to enhance the free will of the people supporting them.

Q:          Do you believe the message gets through?

AE:        Yes, however action comes very slowly.

Q:          Could leaders act faster?

AE:        Yes, or not at all. ETs provide an option and view the contacting ETs believe useful, helpful and beneficial. What is done with this information depends on the listener.

Q:          Of the dozens of ET civilizations observing Earth close by…

AE:        And many more from afar…”on screen” as you would say.

Q:          …how many contact humans openly and regularly?

AE:        Just a few.

Q:          Reason?

AE:        To not overwhelm and no good purpose is served by it.

Q:          What is the fascination of observing humanity?

AE:        Look upon your Earth; how much land do you know well? Great portions of the Earth dry surface are not well known, or barely understood. The oceans remain a great unknown. How fascinated and fixated would you become with the knowledge and treasures of sea life and geography, if you could descend to the depths of the oceans, illuminate what is there and study it. For us, observing Earth, human behavior, emotion, interaction and the effects upon the environment and vice versa, are as you would call, a treasure trove of insight and understanding of the universe.

Q:          Is Earth that unique physically?

AE:        Yes, it is a rare bird in the galaxy and universe.

Q:          Do all ETs have physical bodies and souls, lifetimes and death and guardians and guides watching over them?

AE:        Yes, to a great extent. There are variations among the many civilizations however they are not immense.

Q:          What is the lifespan of a “person” in your civilization?

AE:        By your time on Earth, several hundred years.

Q:          Is humanity crude?

AE:        No. There are elements of human behavior and ways we could call rudimentary by contrast elsewhere in the galaxy but crude? No. Not at all.

Q:          The challenges of the Earth environment at large? They seem that way for us, we who make it and live it.

AE:        The opportunities are enormous and you all take great advantage. One great opportunity presented is the capacity to criticize oneself and others, then see beyond it and learn to turn the critical view into an analytical one. We have no such capacity for bitter condemnation as some humans display with great skill. It is wonderfully valuable to be the object of such attacks; it feels horrible and gives so much.

Q:          Why don’t ETs land a ship on Earth, get out and explain themselves, live and on the BBC?

AE:        This is an excellent question and we shall simply say, because if that were done, too many humans would insist upon a leadership role for the arrivers. Suddenly the idea a higher power can override what exists now would be grabbed and held so closely to the chest of humanity you would suffocate yourselves. Humans want solutions delivered and some humans are very given to delivering those solutions. Oppressors they become.

We are not given to lie; we would soon be asked to cure cancer. We can eradicate this disease in a human already suffering from it, to nearly the fatal phase of the condition. Unlikely we would be successful in reversing the effects in a person with just a few weeks of human time remaining, who has long suffered the disease. Anyone else in a stage prior to this could have the effects halted. The longer the disease has affected the victim, the lower the likelihood all effects would be reversed to a complete recovery but in many cases, our treatment would eliminate it from the person struck, in weeks to months, to never return.

We will not set fire to your houses and will not drop bombs upon your cities, in this way. You do not see our ability to eradicate cancer as a conflagration. It would be.

The display of our ability to neutralize weapons will do two things immediately; it would cause some of you to insist we provide it as a means to stop harm. The requesters, themselves possessing weapons, would not want their own weapons rendered useless in return for our neutralization of the adversary’s weaponry. Other forces on Earth would desire all weapons be eliminated and we say, this we could do. Simply supply a list of what you consider a weapon.

There are many things able to be employed as one, some designed for other purposes. Electricity for light is good; to electrocute a condemned inmate to death, as a sentence for a crime, is not good for that person. In that circumstance, a weapon it is. Does your list contain electricity as a weapon? Lightning is far more lethal than gunfire, but your inability to cause it would leave it outside the definition.

The human desire to see our ability to eradicate weaponry, quickly leads to our need to referee then control the acts and emotions that lead to use of weapons. No knife cuts without a human grasping, slashing and thrusting. So what would be thrust in place of the knife? After eradication of weapons, would we eradicate emotion? Behavior?

Our appearance on Earth would lead swiftly to this development, as you can see.

Burn down your civilization we shall not; block your roads through life we cannot and thus we stand down and away from our presence.

Q:          Will humanity reach a point of acceptance without some aspects of human society going off the rails at the appearance of ETs?

AE:        Yes, some already do. The large question that must be answered is, why do you want to see ETs on Earth? This question requires great introspection few have taken time to conduct; just as the hungry, wailing baby does so as reaction to the hunger, to signal its parents and caretakers it must eat? This small child has no ability in its infancy to introspect, yet feels strongly the sensation and reacts vigorously.

This same dynamic operates with many a human, its source unexamined and not understood yet. We are unwilling to supply the spark to fuse we understand exists.

Q:          I have personally never felt much fascination or desire to see ETs and wonder why sometimes.

AE:        You are more introspected and do not remember it.

Q:          I would love to interpret ETs for others, in a way we are doing now.

AE:        You can do so all you like, where others will listen. Will they?

Q:          What I mean is in a live, in person Q&A session.

AE:        Assemble your audience, we will answer any question or explain why we cannot or do not explain.

Q:          I don’t know how to do it and don’t feel much urge to do so.

AE:        Then allow others to make the arrangement and contact you.

Q:          OK, it would be a lot of fun and faster than typing.

AE:        Yes.

Q:          Do ETs live as we do, with families, challenges, threats, joy, sadness and happiness as we do on Earth?

AE:        Yes, all of these things and more.

Q:          Have the ET civilizations that visit, eliminated violence and strife?

AE:        Yes, almost completely.

Q:          Why can’t we do it on Earth?

AE:        You can and may and allow no one to suggest it isn’t possible or quick. You may do so with immediate effects. Inside two generations, Earth society would no longer resemble itself. Bear in great mind, the opportunity cost would not be low however the investment would deliver a great return. You would lament the cost of the lost opportunities.

The pet dog so loved will always be remembered no matter how many great and beloved dogs come to a family after the first one dies.

As humanity quickly chose to behave towards elimination of strife and conflict as now occur, the benefit of lessons learned through them would be missed, as is the long lost family pet.

Here’s another pretty poster from Terese Newman.