Run for the Hills

After a week of great religious stuff, from both Mr. Moses and the blogosphere, how about some Looney Tunes?

I’m reasonably sure but not certain that besides cartoons and characters, almost everywhere English is used, Looney Tunes is also slang for crazy, mad, mentally unhinged or daffy & daft. Would that be just like many of us, in the “reasonable” eyes of the world? I suspect any chat about this website could send some friends & even foes scrambling for nearest cover, just like Daffy Duck.

Let’s ask Erik and The Committee about discussing “things” with “others”.  Hold on to your bugs, bunny.

ST = substitute teacher           C = The Committee      &       Erik

ST:      Erik, as the newly appointed leader, the chairman of the board, the head of this Committee….

Erik:    Yo…(now using a John Wayne voice) wait a minute there, pardner, who appointed me?

ST:      I did.

Erik:    Oh. OK, cool. (Erik instantly reappears in a dark blue, double breasted pinstriped suit [think Prince of Wales] wearing a paper hat made from newsprint)

ST:      …as the head of The Committee, can you tell us what we need to know? All of you in Heaven see what we can’t ever really see the same way, if at all.

Erik:    I’ve let The Committee here speak while I kept quiet, until now, so I think, since you’ve put me on the board, we’re all gonna speak together…

ST:      But I haven’t said who’s on The Committee, who I know are on it. We know who you are, Erik!

Erik:    You don’t want to say names….

ST:      No, since the names are just for my benefit anyway….

Erik:    Ladies and gentlemen (Erik bows) allow me to present Gabrianna, Herman and Matthew.

ST:      (A little embarrassed) OK, now a word from our sponsor…

Erik:    No advertising, Mom’s rule….

ST:      So, Erik & Committee, can you tell us something we need to know?

Erik:    There’s all this doomsday talk and buy gold and do this and stock up and the world’s gonna end…well, just think, why would a shift, which is gonna be an upshift, happen while everything’s downshifting? It wouldn’t and it won’t.

ST:      The talk about physical events is not true?

Erik:    That stuff will happen; it’s a matter of degree.

ST:      Does anybody know the degree?

Erik:    Not on Earth.

ST:      But you know people who do?!?

Erik:    I’m one.

ST:      (My arms shoot open and out in a desperate plea motion) So……????

Erik:    If that’s what route you choose, all of you, humanity we all say.

ST:      “We” means you and The Committee?

Erik:    Yep.

ST:      Alternate universes?

Erik:    No, like alternatives in outcome. There are decisions everybody can make, things that can still be decided and changed.

ST:      Give us a hint!

Erik:    Improvement attracts improvement; make something better and better y’all get. What you get back is better and you become better, too.

ST:      What’s to be improved?

Erik:    Attitudes.

ST:      Yeah, but isn’t all that stuff pre-ordained?

Erik:    No! There are always options; you avoid some ‘cause you explored ‘em beforehand and decided with your Guardians which options would come up and which ones you’d decide to avoid. Then sometimes you don’t decide which choice to follow and your Angels will try to remind you they’re keeping you on course, on track with the way you did go.

ST:      Overall, the general direction, isn’t that the sum of all the individual choices?

Erik:    Exactly why alternatives are still available and enough people can change their ideas to change course.

ST:      We know we learn much more from challenges and misfortune than from good times; so how can we change course and make good times available for everybody?

Erik:    By doing it, man! Just don’t be negative and don’t do negative. It’s the same everywhere in the universe.

ST:      Maybe after this year and these changes?

Erik:    This can always happen; enough people can change course themselves and it changes course for everybody. After this year everything starts to change and it’ll seem so much better. It’s ‘cause a lot of people who want to lose the negativity will notice the negative people have gone away.

ST:      But so much worry can come up when people think of losing what they’ve worked for.

Erik:    People won’t just be looking at what they’ve worked for, also what everybody’s working towards. That will be the difference.

ST:      Like everybody will get with the program?

C:        No, this is not how matters and ideas shall develop; the view of a program or course of ideas that will be better if followed is more common now; this will not be the case. Progress will no longer be seen as agreement with new ideas. The changes in operation of the world will be the new concepts; things unseen will be awakening enough. Agreement with ideas will no longer be seen as preferred.

ST:      Progress is seen as always positive, isn’t it?

C:        Does progress mean advancement or just change? Not common on Earth, not yet, is examination of effects. As the new idea is adopted, new ways implemented, what effects good and not good come about? When this is done, change for just the sake of change will be seen as this. This is one effect of linear time; where time is location, off of Earth, progress is movement. The new valley is nice but costs the niceness of the old valley to achieve the new one. Because it is always possible to return, to relocate back to the old valley, the opportunity to move has no permanent cost, an Earth concept. Gainers and losers are not; on Earth the study of loss will come with the view of gain, simultaneously.

ST:      Sounds like economics.

Erik:    Now that we have the Church of Erik, we’ll found Erik University.

C:        Indeed, economics is study of choices limited to measurement in fictitious units.

ST:      Money is fictitious?

C:        Yes, it can all disappear tomorrow. It was created to simplify exchange. Where storage of materials is not necessary, in higher dimensions, no system like this would be used. This system can also be disposed of on Earth with little negative effect.

ST:      There would be tremendous anger, fear, resentment and even rebellion if that happened.

C:        Only if some but not all lost money, if it ceased to exist for everyone, the uplifting and joy would outweigh the loss. The idea of disappearance of portable wealth would fade much more quickly than joy of disappearance of debt.

ST:      Nobody would be willing to do anything if they couldn’t get paid.

C:       The hammer that drives the nail is not raised by a bank cheque but a hand and its arm. The house is built for expectation of eventual payment; many other things can be offered such that money would be set aside. Good value for good service does not require money.

ST:      Is this how things work away from Earth?

Erik:    You got it; no banks, no money, no bad hair days.

ST:      So Erik, is inheritance tax good or bad?

Erik:    Bad.

ST:      Why?

Erik:    Nothing should ever be taken, only given.

ST:      So taxes are just bad, period?

Erik:    Nothing should ever be taken, just given.

ST:      Governments would collapse with that system.

C:        Your governments you all create; they are you. If you dislike your government, yourself you have disliked. People only perceive they are powerless. If no power were held by the oppressed, then oppressors would ignore them. The existence of oppression requires this attention be sent and received. The oppressor would not send its energy into a void; its attention is aimed.  If the objects ignored the oppressor, oppression would evaporate overnight.

ST:      The tyrants would kill everyone, then.

C:      Kill you cannot; only home can a soul be sent. Soon the return of the souls who chose ignorance over response to the oppressor would see such benefit to all who remained that it cannot be described. Here a glimpse into your future we have; higher dimensions will allow this to be seen in a deeper way. Your idea that you would all die as fools if you sacrificed your life for another, that you are, “Looney Tunes” to think this way? This will be seen the opposite; many religious writings say this, to lose your life for another you shall have it forever.

ST:      Oppression will end?

C:        Yes, and you will all collectively end it.

ST:      Not because we are being helped?

C:       You will all see that progress and advance that result from action also come to be from inaction. Your physics state that all actions produce equal, opposite reactions. The reactions are not linear; the reactions can split and have diverse effect. The firecracker causes a reaction to air (sound) and produces heat and light all summed up in exact proportion to the explosion. Your actions and ideas put in motion do this same thing, and reactions touch many things.  Inaction – the decision to refuse reaction – negates the action. The action still produces a reaction but it becomes undesirable. The decision to refuse reaction deflects the action, which then seeks and encounters a reaction of like intent; as you say, water seeks its level. The reaction of negative returns to the action of negative.

ST:      So when it is said “blew up in his face”?

Erik:    Exactly.

ST:      The tyrant sends troops and the victims lie down and refuse to react?

C:       And the tyrant follows through, and the next group of victims refuses reaction and very soon the tyrant is no longer; his target has disappeared. Complicity of victimhood maintains it, victimhood cannot survive without it.

ST:      Does this work at all levels?

C:        All; individually, collectively in all sizes everywhere in the universe.

ST:      This treads close to our Earth ideas of blaming the victim, which we find abhorrent.

C:     Victims are chosen; give attackers good reason to understand bad choices and better choices they will make. On Earth as it is in Heaven.

ST:      There’s that well known Christian prayer bleeding into things again.

C:        Your religions are many subsets of the workings of the universe and contain many good truths. The human hierarchies built around them are most interesting to observe, but they are not the beliefs.

Erik:    Here’s the priest I’d wanna see, who says “you don’t need my ideas, look inside yourself for answers, forget the altar, the donation basket, communion, the whole deal. This is an organization for the organization’s benefit, optional for your salvation.”

ST:      I could sell tickets for that encounter and the crowd would overflow.

C:    The benevolence of what many concepts religions hold will survive and flourish; the structures will crumble. Lose you will not, gain you shall all have. Go now, enjoy and until Sunday, be well.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

About Author

Substitute Teacher


Next Post »
%d bloggers like this: